ISO 9001:2015ITAR RegisteredRoHS · REACHLead time from 3 business daysMOQ = 1 part
PifyC
Services
Materials
Industries
Applications
Resources
Locations
Company
Request a quote
Additive manufacturing drawing: MJF layer stack, laser beam and lattice structure
MJF 3D Printing

Best nylon surface. HP Multi Jet Fusion. Production ready.

HP Multi Jet Fusion 3D printing — best surface finish of any nylon 3D print process. Ra 6-8 µm vs SLS's Ra 8-12 µm. Faster than SLS for batch production. PA12 and PA11 available. For production-intent prototypes and low-volume end-use parts.

Additive manufacturingWuxi, ChinaMOQ 1 partDFM review included
Technical plate for Best nylon surface. HP Multi Jet Fusion. Production ready.
How we run it

MJF 3D printing service

MJF combines SLS-like production capability with better surface finish, faster speed, and consistent part properties.

3-7 daysTypical lead time
MOQ 1No minimum quantity
<4 hQuote response
ISO 9001Quality system
01 · MJF advantages

Why MJF over other 3D printing.

Best nylon surface

Smoother than SLS (8-12 µm) and FDM (15-30 µm). Cosmetically better, closer to injection molded appearance.

Faster than SLS

HP MJF fuses entire layer at once vs SLS's point-by-point laser. Faster print cycles = faster delivery and lower cost.

Dyed black

Most MJF parts finished in uniform black dye. Consistent color across all parts — unlike SLS grey-white that varies.

Production capable

MJF is used for production, not just prototypes. HP and partners produce millions of parts per year.

PA12 standard

Same PA12 nylon as SLS. Full production-grade mechanical properties.

PA11 elastomeric

Plant-based nylon 11 for impact-critical applications. Higher cost than PA12.

Conductive PA12

Carbon-reinforced conductive PA12 for ESD-safe electronics housings.

Dimensional accuracy

Consistent across batches. Tighter than SLS for some feature sizes.

MJF combines SLS-like production capability with better surface finish, faster speed, and consistent part properties.

02 · MJF applications

Where MJF wins.

Bridge production

Production before injection tool ready — 100-1000 parts in MJF while waiting for tool

Low-volume end-use parts

Under 10,000 pieces annually — MJF economical vs injection tooling investment

Consumer product prototypes

Presentation-quality cosmetic prototypes with better surface than SLS

Functional testing

Drop-testing, snap-fits, mechanical validation — real PA12 properties

Industrial components

Low-volume industrial parts — brackets, housings, fixtures

Wearable devices

Consumer wearables and electronics housings

Medical external

Non-implantable medical devices — wearables, patient accessories

Automotive accessories

Interior components, brackets, aftermarket applications

Aerospace interior

Aircraft interior components per FAR flammability — FR MJF available

Get an instant quote

Send your CAD — we reply with detailed pricing, lead time, and DFM feedback within 4 working hours.

Talk to an engineer

WhatsApp our team directly. Most messages answered within 12 minutes during work hours.

Explore all services

CNC, 3D printing, injection molding, sheet metal, casting, finishing — one quality system, one partner.

FAQ

Best nylon surface — questions

MJF vs SLS — which is better?

MJF advantages: better surface finish (Ra 6-8 vs 8-12 µm), faster print cycle (40-60% faster), consistent color with dyeing, improved detail on small features. SLS advantages: more material options (including PA12-GF, PA12-CF), slightly better for very large parts (EOS machines have larger build envelope). For most nylon prototyping and production, MJF is newer and generally better. SLS still dominant in aerospace and specialty material applications.

Production volumes MJF can handle?

HP MJF production capacity: 10,000-50,000 parts per year economical. Above that, injection molding typically cheaper. Major applications use MJF for: medical wearables, automotive interior components, specialty electronics housings, consumer products where design iterates frequently. For stable high-volume designs, injection molding remains cost-effective. For evolving designs, MJF's tool-free production is advantageous.

Why are MJF parts dyed black?

Post-print dyeing (vat dye) provides: uniform color across all parts (unlike variable natural PA12 color), hides surface variation for better cosmetic, common industry expectation. Natural color available but shows more surface detail. Dark blue, dark grey dyeing also available. For brand-specific colors, standardization typically happens at the painting step rather than dyeing.

Dimensional accuracy?

MJF: ±0.15 mm typical on critical features, ±0.05 mm possible on small features with careful orientation. Better than SLS for small features. Like all powder bed fusion, accuracy depends on part size and thermal conditions during print. For tighter tolerances, post-print CNC or grinding brings specific features to CNC tolerance while keeping overall MJF geometry.

Lead time for MJF?

Our MJF: 48 hours for simple parts (one print cycle). Typical 3-5 days for medium orders. Batch multiple customers per build for cost efficiency — shared builds typical for prototype work, dedicated builds for production orders. Rush 24-hour turnaround possible at premium.

Cost comparison?

MJF cost driven by volume (material per part) and build time. Typical small part: $15-40. Medium: $40-120. Large: $120-500. Batch of 100 parts nested in single build: per-part cost drops 30-40% vs single parts. For production volumes (500+ parts monthly), establish relationship for batch scheduling and pricing optimization.

5-axis CNC milling drawing: Al 7075-T6 block with pockets, toolpath and dimensions

Send a CAD file. Get an engineering-reviewed quote.

No minimum quantity, free DFM feedback from a senior manufacturing engineer, and an NDA signed before file review on request.